Updated May 2019: Having lived & worked in some of the best cities in the USA for transit (Portland, OR, Boston, DC, New York, Chicago, SF Bay) as well as some of the worst (LA, Buffalo, Cincinnati, Tampa Bay), there really is no question about how the availability of alternatives to driving on roads affects one’s quality of life in the city.

However, I never cease to be amazed at those cities that are transit-deprived who run vehement anti-transit PR campaigns, attempting to convince folks that they shouldn’t fund transit projects.

So, as a counterpoint to this, I’ve compiled a list of the 10 largest cities in the USA with no Metro system of any sort – where your only option getting to work is either (a) sitting in your car in traffic, or (b) sitting in a bus that’s sitting in the same traffic as your car would be.

Worst offender: Tampa Far and away the largest metro area with no rail is the Tampa Bay area in Florida. Tampa-St. Pete-Clearwater is a sprawling metropolis with over 3 million people, which jumps to 4 million if you include the Sarasota area.

The fact of the Tampa area being so car-centric has repeatedly landed Tampa on the #1 list for the most bicycle deaths per-capita in the USA, and is one of the most dangerous cities for cyclists in the WORLD.

Attempts at building any form of transit system have repeatedly failed. This article is a FANTASTIC read, with some extremely telling maps and graphics that describe just how dire the situation is.

Some of the most-telling maps from the article above:

So, without further ado, the list of largest US cities without rail transit:

Tampa / St. Pete / Clearwater, FL
3,032,171

No metro or light rail.

There’s a downtown heritage trolly in Tampa, but this is not meant to be a bona-fide transit option.

No commuter rail. Daily Amtrak service for inter-city.
San Antonio, TX
2,429,609
Nope, just buses.

Daily Amtrak trains (no commuter rail).

There are long-term plans in mind as well to develop a high-speed commuter rail train between Austin and San Antonio to relieve the I-35 corridor, but this is still in the planning stage.

Indianapolis, IN
2,103,574
No metro or light rail. The city actually currently has a BAN on light rail, and when attempting to lift that ban, lawmakers actually wrote language that “prohibited Marion County from using any transit dollars for light rail until the county has “substantially remedied” the pothole problem this year. “
No commuter rail. Amtrak for inter-city.
Columbus, OH
2,093,185
No metro or light rail. Columbus is actually the largest city in the USA with no passenger train service of any kind whatsoever.
No passenger rail service of any sort.
Raleigh-Durham, NC
1,795,750
No metro or light rail. There was a light-rail network in the planning stages, which was essentially torpedoed by Duke University as they objected to the trains.
No commuter service. Amtrak serves inter-city.
Oklahoma City, OK
1,373,211

No metro or light rail.

The Oklahoma City Streetcar recently broke ground and is under construction with a 7-mile loop and estimate of December 2018 to be in revenue service.

Amtrak provides daily service to Ft Worth via the Heartland Flyer. No Commuter rail service.
Memphis, TN
1,342,842
No metro or light rail
The Amtrak City of New Orleans operates one daily train in each direction between New Orleans and Chicago.
Richmond, VA
1,294,204
No metro or light rail. The city opted in 2003 to drop plans for light rail owing to the city’s sprawl, and instead pursued a Bus Rapid Transit line called the Pulse.
Richmond has two Amtrak stations which serve intercity traffic to Norfolk and Washington, DC.
Louisville, KY
1,283,430
No metro or light rail
Louisville is the second largest city in the USA with no passenger rail service of any sort.
No intercity or commuter rail service.
Rochester, NY
1,078,879
No metro or light rail
Amtrak provides intercity service.


Note: Updating this for November 2018, as there are a few cities previously on the list when I first wrote this (Detroit, Kansas City, Cincinnati, Orlando) that have rolled out rail transit services for commuters. I’m striking from this list any city that does now have an option for transit that doesn’t involve getting gridlocked into the rest of the city’s road infrastructure. So, light rail, streetcar and commuter rail count.

Recently Stricken from the List: (i.e. cities which now have passenger rail options for commuters)

Milwaukee, WI
1,757,604
The Milwaukee Hop Streetcar opened on November 2, 2018, an initial 2-mile loop in what (hopefully) will be a more extensive streetcar network in the city, connecting the downtown core with the intermodal train station that offers regular Amtrak train service to Chicago.
No commuter rail, and governor recently snubbed inter-city rail to Madison. Only passenger rail service is 1x/daily Empire Builder and 7x/daily Hiawatha service to Chicago.
Detroit, MI
5,207,434
There is a 2.9 mile people-mover loop in the downtown area, and the new Q-Line service is a 3-mile streetcar.
No commuter rail. Amtrak for inter-city service.
Orlando, FL
2.861,296
No metro or light rail.
SunRail is now open! Also, high-speed rail will soon connect Orlando to the Miami / FLL corridor, and Amtrak Silver Service provides intercity to Tampa, Miami and points north.
Cincinnati, OH
2,179,965
No light rail or metro. The city tried to construct a subway in 1927, but it was never completed – leaving a massive un-used tunnel under the city. Every plan to try to bring train service to Cinci failed until the new Cinci streetcar system which broke ground in 2012, and opened in 2015.
No commuter rail. Amtrak service for inter-city.
Kansas City, MO
2,122,908
The new KC streetcar opened in 2015 as a starter line for what (WE HOPE!) will be a larger transit network to serve the city.
No commuter rail. Amtrak service for inter-city.

Comments

kabul — August 30, 2013 at 2:52 pm

Cincinnati has inter-city Amtrak at Union Terminal and is constructing a streetcar

Tom — August 30, 2013 at 4:00 pm

The Tampa streetcar is definitely faster than walking… Unless someone is walking 2.7 miles in 15-20 minutes. Just FYI.

Bus62 — August 30, 2013 at 10:36 pm

Milwaukee is bigger than St Louis (metro pop of 1,566,981 according to Wikipedia) and has no urban rail system. One was planned in the 80’s but it died long ago. A streetcar is planned. Also Detroit’s people mover (with questionable utility) is for all intents and purposes heavy rail (metro), even if it is very short. I would take off Tampa and Detroit and add Milwaukee and whatever the next one is.

Dougie — August 30, 2013 at 11:40 pm

San Antonio is planning a streetcar system which will is schedule to open by 2017.

Tim S Porter — September 1, 2013 at 4:32 pm

While Miami has the Metrorail, the fact it doesn’t really go anywhere sucks, highly underused. The addition of the Airport(2012) spur is a big plus though.

Caleb — September 2, 2013 at 2:38 am

Columbus needs a rail system. Yesterday.

Tapha Ndiaye — October 8, 2014 at 2:48 pm

This article is extremely misguided: not having a rail system is not the same as not having good transit. Even in cities with rail, I’ve often preferred to take the bus because of better frequency, the time it takes to get from the sidewalk to the rail platform (and vice versa), and you can see outside. These types of articles are just perpetuating the myth that cities should spend billions of dollars on rail transit just to be part of some “rail city club.” It’s the same mentality that led to cities gutting themselves to build interstates in the 1950s through the 1980s. A city can provide superior transit (and indeed, many already have) by improving the EXISTING bus network: frequent service, off-board fare payment, bus-only lanes that are enforced, transit-signal priority, or Bus Rapid Transit which costs a quarter of light rail and is faster to build.

What’s really lacking in most of these cities isn’t rail, it’s transit ridership to justify a big transit ridership, because minimum parking requirements have made driving so cheap that there’s no reason to use transit unless you’re desperate.

Xi Li — August 9, 2017 at 2:00 am

Why does LA perpetually get a spot on “worst transit” lists? LA Metro has the #2 most ridden bus system in the country, a very high ridership subway/LRT system, and a couple good BRT lines. In terms of # of jobs within 30 minutes of transit, LA is #3 in the country. Stop going off perception and look at reality. LA has great car culture and LA loves beautiful cars and driving, the traffic is atrocious, but it also has decent transit, better than any US city except the legacy Northeastern cities and SF.

JP Baldwin — September 10, 2017 at 4:11 am

September 10, 2017

Columbus is the most unskilled, untalented, unoriginal, fake, cookie cutter, bottom of the barrel, incompetent, ultra-corrupt shit hole in North America. It will never have rail service and the rest of the country shouldn’t have to pay for it. I have had multiple rail service plans for Columbus that have been laughed at and thrown in the trash for 15yrs. Columbus could have rail service in 5 yrs without even trying.

10 Largest Cities in the USA with no Metro/Passenger Rail - updated now that Milwaukee opened its streetcar - Intermex Transportation — November 30, 2018 at 6:38 pm

[…] View Reddit by turbotad – View Source […]

Commuter Characteristics in US Cities – Urban Data Blog — April 19, 2019 at 8:04 pm

[…] cities on my top 100 list still don’t have light rail in 2019. (If you want to see what decades of disinvestment and political resistance to mass transit […]

alexlovestrains — February 1, 2021 at 8:40 pm

There used to be a subway in Rochester, NY until it closed in 1956.

flamealchamist — August 25, 2021 at 3:46 am

any updates to this list? Shocked to see that some cities had subway in the past.

style
light