Skip to the content
OpsInventor

OpsInventor

Adobe Experience Manager Consulting & Knowhow

  • Home
  • About
  • AEM / CQ

Google HTTPS Search Results for Logged-In Users

October 19, 2011 1 By Tad Reeves

I saw this post today on Google switching to HTTPS search results, referred from my trusty Slashdot.

Obviously, I didn’t like it – mostly because, from a website owner perspective, it eliminates the ability to get real-time reporting on keywords, which makes response to media events and such where mass keyword-driven traffic to your site all of the sudden requires proper response & content.

Curious as to whether sites would show up as “no referrer” (i.e. with referrer data totally stripped out) or if they’d show up redirected like Google+ links, I did some tests.  They do show up with a Google referrer – just one that has the search keywords obfuscated:

Clicking through a link from HTTPS Google:

I searched for “These Terrible Twos Aren’t Too Terrible“, clicked on the top link which is from my parenting site.

The log line I get resulting from this click through is:

4.2.2.2 - - [19/Oct/2011:11:26:48 -0500] "GET /these-terrible-twos-arent-too-terrible/ HTTP/1.1" 200 66517 http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved= 0CB0QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scientologyparent.com%2Fthese-terrible-twos-arent-too- terrible%2F&ei=OfqeTpH2B4Pi0QHBoI2SCQ&usg=AFQjCNHBqTWXZLEY0uBUia1-l7RegVujXA" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1"

It obviously then obfuscates the search terms, but still at least tells you it was a Google organic result.  I’ve yet to see how Google plans to deliver these 30-day Keyword digests, but now that will obviously become another staple of daily analytics.

Update:

Curious as to how the rest of Google & Facebook services handle HTTPS links, I ran the same test on HTTPS Gmail, Google+ and Facebook.  Results:

Clicking through a link from HTTPS Gmail:

4.2.2.2 - - [19/Oct/2011:12:01:21 -0500] "GET /these-terrible-twos-arent-too-terrible/ 
HTTP/1.1" 200 66517 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1"
Clicking through a link from HTTPS Google+:
4.2.2.2 - - [19/Oct/2011:12:01:21 -0500] "GET /these-terrible-twos-arent-too-terrible/ 
HTTP/1.1" 200 66517 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1"

I had earlier done some tests on Google+ HTTPS, and clicking through links in G+ would send you to an intermediate HTTP page which then would send you on to the target link.  This way, one could at least tell if traffic was coming to your site from Google+.  It seems they’ve done away with that, which is unfortunate.  I haven’t seen any traffic appear in my stats from Google+ since shortly after launch — I always attributed that to low takeup on G+ compared to my followings on Facebook & such, but now it appears that it’s simply because the referring info was stripped out.

Clicking through a link from HTTPS Facebook:

4.2.2.2 - - [19/Oct/2011:12:02:33 -0500] "GET /these-terrible-twos-arent-too-terrible/ 
HTTP/1.1" 200 66517 "http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scientologyparent.com%2F
these-terrible-twos-arent-too-terrible%2F&h=tAQA11y3eAQBsxDhnT7lzULhrGsW4OkAZv30JIUOUOuUTlA" 
"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1"

Facebook is the only other service that actually redirects you to an intermediate HTTP page that at least discloses where the traffic came from.

 

38.896264-77.168816

Share me:

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • More
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Categoryseo
Tagsgoogle https keywords login redirect search engine optimization seo stripped out
Uncovering New States of Matter by Packing Lunch
Another Late-Night Code Deployment

About The Author

Tad Reeves

AEM Engineer, cyclist, daddy of 3, and transit/train enthusiast.

1 Comment

  • turbotad says:
    October 19, 2011 at 5:58 pm

    Note: See this post I made on Google+ back on 7 July:

    https://plus.google.com/101265368753828318255/posts/eJqQCgznhtb

    At that point in time, G+ HTTPS links would indeed route you through to an interstitial HTTP page which would then provide a referrer string, such that one could at least tell that the user had clicked-through from G+.

    Loading...
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Top Posts & Pages

  • List of Largest Cities in the USA with No Metro / Passenger Rail
  • Two Million Views on Flickr: Stories Behind the Photos
  • Using Splunk for Log Search & Monitoring on AEM as a Cloud Service
  • Blue-Green Deployment on Adobe Experience Manager
  • AEM as a Cloud Service - New Features & Announcements from Adobe Summit
  • Adobe Managed Services vs. Self-Hosting AEM - Pros & Cons
  • AEM as a Cloud Service a Year Later - Update on Features & Limitations
  • Implementing SSL on AEM
  • Useful AEM-related Splunk Searches for Author / Publish / Dispatcher
  • AEM as a Cloud Service - Q&A with Adobe and Should You Migrate Now?
My Tweets

Recent Comments

  • rwinterpacht on AEM as a Cloud Service – New Features & Announcements from Adobe Summit
  • Tad Reeves on AEM as a Cloud Service – Q&A with Adobe and Should You Migrate Now?
  • Special Monkey on AEM as a Cloud Service – Q&A with Adobe and Should You Migrate Now?
  • Sam on Tips for AEM Infrastructure in China: Designing an in-China or Near-China Site Architecture
  • Meera on Tips for AEM Infrastructure in China: Designing an in-China or Near-China Site Architecture

Archives

  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • March 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • June 2013
  • March 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • October 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • April 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006

Top Posts & Pages

  • List of Largest Cities in the USA with No Metro / Passenger Rail
  • Two Million Views on Flickr: Stories Behind the Photos
  • Using Splunk for Log Search & Monitoring on AEM as a Cloud Service
  • Blue-Green Deployment on Adobe Experience Manager
  • AEM as a Cloud Service - New Features & Announcements from Adobe Summit
  • Adobe Managed Services vs. Self-Hosting AEM - Pros & Cons
  • AEM as a Cloud Service a Year Later - Update on Features & Limitations
  • Implementing SSL on AEM
  • Useful AEM-related Splunk Searches for Author / Publish / Dispatcher
  • AEM as a Cloud Service - Q&A with Adobe and Should You Migrate Now?

Pages

  • About this Site
  • Rental Car Review: Gas Mileage Comparison
  • Tad Reeves | About

Flickr Photos

PXL_20230128_124005094Vampire Cat20230127_074317Co-PilotSunriseIcy Bird Bath at Sunrise
More Photos
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Envo Magazine
%d bloggers like this: